6/13/2023 0 Comments Cloudfogger vs boxcryptor![]() Viivo doesn’t encrypt filenames and is also account-based.Cloudfogger stores keys on their own servers.Boxcryptor seems a good solution, but costs quite a lot of money for such a simple task.There are quite a few solutions out there, but none of them satisfied my needs. If you have experiences of using alternatives to Dropbox, or have found an encryption regime which works well with Dropbox, please share your experiences by leaving a comment below.įound this article interesting? Follow Graham Cluley on Twitter or Mastodon to read more of the exclusive content we post.Recently I thought about privacy in the cloud and came to the conclusion, that it’s time to do something about it and use some kind of client-side encryption. That really helps you consider the security consequences of what you are doing. In the case of Wuala, they also make a point of underlining that their data centres are located in Europe rather than the United States, which will be appealing to some.Īs with all of these technologies, remember my adage: Don’t call it ‘the cloud’. Such solutions have the advantage of having security and privacy baked-in from the outset. Some also swear by open source tools like TrueCrypt to do something similar.Īlternatively, the likes of Wuala and SpiderOak offer competing solutions to Dropbox but promise “zero knowledge” of what you’re uploading to their servers. Tools like Boxcryptor, CloudFogger and SafeMonk provide a seamless way to encrypt your sensitive information before it gets uploaded to Dropbox, meaning the service cannot tell what you are storing in the cloud. Encrypt your files before you upload them to Dropbox.If you don’t like the idea of your files being examined in this way, you have two choices. But it’s clearly the case that data uploaded to Dropbox is not as private as some might have hoped and imagined. Whether you consider this snooping or not, is a matter for some debate and argument. It was just made inaccessible to other internet users (the public link was disabled, and redirected to the DMCA message). If you share a file with other internet users in a Dropbox folder that has the same hash as one on Dropbox’s list, you’ll no doubt have the same problem as Darrell Whitelaw and his friend.įinally, the file wasn’t removed from Whitelaw’s Dropbox folder. Instead, Dropbox has a database of hashes (checksums, if you prefer) of files that have been previously been identified as copyright material that have been taken down by DMCA requests. Secondly, the content of the actual files are not being examined. Instead, it only appears to be done for files which are being shared with other internet users via the service. There are a few important things to note here.įirstly, it doesn’t appear that Dropbox is doing this with all files stored on its data servers. We have an automated system that then prevents other users from sharing the identical material using another Dropbox link. ![]() When we receive these, we process them according to the law and disable the identified link. “We sometimes receive DMCA notices to remove links on copyright grounds. The folks at Ars Technica reached out to Dropbox, who confirmed that it checks publicly shared links to files, and compares the hashes of shared files to those that have previously been subject to successful DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedown requests. The media, understandably, latched onto the story. I treat like my hard drive, this shows it’s not private, nor mine, even though i pay for it. Whitelaw tweeted the screenshot, which was rapidly retweeted by many other Twitter users over the weekend concerned that Dropbox might be snooping on users’ content, and explained: This is what was seen when the link was accessed:Ĭertain files in this folder can’t be shared due to a takedown request in accordance with the DMCA. He uploaded a movie file to his Dropbox folder, and – during an instant message conversation – shared a link to it with an online friend.īecause the movie was copyrighted, and Dropbox – it appears – is attempting to stop copyright-infringers from sharing files via public Dropbox links. Dropbox user Darrell Whitelaw got a surprise this weekend.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |